Claude Code
Codex
Cursor
ChatGPT
Windsurf
Gemini CLI
Antigravity
VS Code
Cline
n8nScreaming Frog is a great piece of software and I am not going to pretend to compete with it on crawling. It is free up to 500 URLs, $279 per user per year after that, and it will find every redirect chain, broken canonical and missing alt tag you have.
The problem with a crawler is not the crawl. It is the export, and that is where ContextBolt starts.
Four thousand findings, sorted by the wrong thing
You run the crawl. You get a spreadsheet with thousands of rows grouped by issue type. Missing meta descriptions, 431 of them. Duplicate titles, 89. Images without alt text, 1,200.
Sorted by type, which is not the order you should fix them in. Most of those pages get no impressions at all, and fixing a meta description on a page nobody sees is a very tidy way to achieve nothing.
ContextBolt sorts differently, because Search Console is connected. Which of these pages actually earns impressions. Which ones sit at position 11 to 15, where a fix moves real clicks. Which ones have a query mismatch rather than a technical problem at all.
That is a list of ten things, not four thousand.
The half a crawler cannot see
A crawler reads your site. It knows nothing about anyone else’s.
So it cannot tell you what the competing pages cover, what the search intent for your target term actually is, where a competitor’s links come from, or whether ChatGPT recommends them by name when someone asks the buying question.
ContextBolt does all of that in the same $35, and the findings arrive inside Claude, Cursor or Codex, so the agent that reads the audit can also read the page and draft the fix.
Keep the frog
Genuinely. This is one of the comparisons where the right answer for a lot of people is both.
ContextBolt’s site audits cover up to 50 pages per run, which is the section, the small site, or the pages you already know matter. A full technical crawl with JavaScript rendering and custom extraction is the crawler’s job, and the two sit together well.
$279 a year plus $35 a month is a sensible stack for a site that earns its living from search. The site audit workflow guide shows how the agent side handles the fix-and-verify loop.
Where Screaming Frog still fits
Full-site crawls, JavaScript rendering, custom extraction, log file analysis and crawl configuration are the crawler’s job, and Screaming Frog does them better than anything else on a desktop. Free to 500 URLs and $279 a year after that is a fair price for the instrument.
What it cannot do is tell you which of its findings matter, what the competing pages cover, or whether AI answers cite you. That is the $35, and the two run side by side. Connect Search Console and the export becomes a short list.
Try it on the list you already have
If you have a Screaming Frog export sitting in a spreadsheet, that is the perfect test. Connect Search Console and ask which of those pages are actually worth fixing.
The answer is usually much shorter than the export. Start the 7-day trial with 100 credits. A card is required, and it becomes $35 a month unless you cancel before the trial ends.